If You Sort, There Will Always Be A Bottom

[pullquote align=”normal”]If you sort them, there will always be a bottom. What good does that serve? [/pullquote]

“Those students are in the 50th percentile. What real school will accept them? They can go to local community college.”

I’ll confess. I overheard this statement while sipping coffee today at Starbucks.

Jack Welch made a specific type of management formula famous where he consistently cut the bottom 10%. He sorted the performance of staff and laid off the bottom 10%, over and over.

What was missing from his formula? It raised stock prices of GM, right?

Humans were missing.

No matter how good the staff is, there will always be a bottom 10%. You can have the highest performing group out of all the competition, but within your group, there will always be a bottom 10%.

Same with students. If you sort them, you’ll always have a bottom 10% or a 90th percentile, but it doesn’t value the human. And it only values the metric by which you’re sorting them.

Same with schools. If you sort them, there will always be a bottom, no matter how awesome the entire group is.

What good does it serve? What value does it add? What are other ways to understand students, staff, and schools? Plenty.


Posted

in

by

Tags: